treescribe.blogg.se

Indian anthropometric dimensions for ergonomic design practice pdf
Indian anthropometric dimensions for ergonomic design practice pdf










Gazimağusa, North Cyprus: Eastern Mediterranean University ĭavari M 2013 Anthropometric home office computer workstation setup. Zairina A R and Sallam A A 2009 Prevalence of work-related upper limbs symptoms (WRULS) among office workers. Paul: Ergotron, Inc., and Constant Force Technology, LLC Sweere H C 2002 Ergonomic factors involved in optimum computer workstation design: a pragmatic approach. Circulation 121: 384–391, published online before print January 11 2010. 37(4): 303–311ĭunstan D W, Barr E L M, Healy G N, Salmon J, Shaw J E, Balkau B, Magliano D J, Cameron A J, Zimmet P Z and Owen N 2010 Television viewing time and mortality: the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Haitao Hua Z L 2007 Anthropometric measurement of the Chinese elderly living. Paul: Ergotron, Inc., and Constant Force Technology, LLC, available: Harry C S 2003 Ergonomic factors involved in optimum computer workstation design. 23: 3–8ĭeros B M, Khamis N K, Ismail A R, Jamaluddin H, Adam A M and Rosli S 2011 An ergonomics study on assembly line workstation design. Wang E M Y, Wang M J, Yeh W Y, Shih Y C and Lin Y C 1999 Development of anthropometric work environment for Taiwanese workers. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IIE Annual Research Conference, Houston, TX, USAĭeros B M, Mohamad D, Ismail A R, Soon O W, Lee K C and Nordin M S 2009 Recommended chair and work surfaces dimensions of VDT tasks for Malaysian citizens. Yodpijit N, Bunterngchit Y and Lockhart T E 2004 Anthropometry of Thai Technical University students.

indian anthropometric dimensions for ergonomic design practice pdf

Lu J L D P 2007 Anthropometric measurement of Filipino manufacturing workers. Ĭhuan T K, Hartono M and Kumar N 2010 Anthropometry of the Singaporean and Indonesian populations. Hu H, Li Z, Yan, J, Wang X, Xiao H, Duan J and Zheng L 2007 Anthropometric measurement of the Chinese elderly living in the Beijing area. Nurul Shahida M S, Siti Zawiah M D and Case K 2015 The relationship between anthropometry and hand grip strength among elderly Malaysians. Lin Y C, Wang M J and Wang E M 2004 The comparisons of anthropometric characteristics among four peoples in East Asia. Pheasant S 1996 Bodyspace: anthropometry, ergonomics and design of work. Jürgens H W, Aune I A and Pieper U 1990 International data on anthropometry. Jamir L, Kalaivani M, Nongkynrih B, Misra P and Gupta S K 2015 Anthropometric characteristics and undernutrition among older persons in a rural area of northern India. Sanders M S and McCormick E J 1992 Human factors in engineering and design, McGraw-Hill International ed. 32(3): 239–246ĭawal S Z M, Ismail Z, Yusuf K, Rashid S H A, Shalahim N S M, Abdullah N S and Kamil N S M 2015 Determination of the significant anthropometry dimensions for user-friendly designs of domestic furniture and appliances – experience from a study in Malaysia. Taiwan: Ergonomics Society of Taiwan (in Chinese)īolstad G, Benum B and Rokne A 2001 Anthropometry of Norwegian light industry and office workers. Wang M J, Wang E M Y and Lin Y C 2001 Anthropometric data book of the Chinese people in Taiwan. Klamklay J, Sungkhapong A, Yodpijit N and Patterson P E 2008 Anthropometry of the southern Thai population.

indian anthropometric dimensions for ergonomic design practice pdf

Public Health 27(2): 425–436, ĭawal S Z M, Zadry H R, Azmi S N S, Rohim S R and Sartika S J 2012 Anthropometric database for the learning environment of high school and university students Int. Vasquez K, Malhotra R, Ostbye T, Chan M F, Amin H, Khoo G and Thilagaratnam S 2015 Extent and correlates of change in anthropometric and fitness outcomes among participants in a corporate team-based weight loss challenge in Singapore: lose to win 2009. The knowledge of variations in the population is useful in designing sound workstations and facilities for the betterment of the industrial environment. Filipinos and Malaysian data were almost similar and appear to have the smallest values for eye height (male: 155 cm, female: 143 cm) and elbow height (male: 104 cm, female: 96 cm). The results indicated that the Indonesians were the tallest (male: 172 cm, female: 159 cm) among the four countries, whereas the Filipinos were the shortest for both male and female (male: 167 cm, female: 153.9 cm). Thirty-six anthropometric dimensions were selected for comparison based on common availability among the four countries. The anthropometric data were subsequently compared to those from three selected Asian countries, focussing on the sitting and standing posture dimensions. An anthropometric database for sitting and standing dimensions for Malaysian operators was developed based on the measurements from 146 male and 168 female participants (18–45 years old).












Indian anthropometric dimensions for ergonomic design practice pdf